8 reasons why constitutional monarchy is the best form of government

Constitutional monarchy is the best form of government, so despite many people saying that having a monarch as head of state is good for tourism, and not much else, we are going to prove otherwise. Here are eight reasons why a constitutional monarchy is the best form of government.

Why is constitutional monarchy a good thing? Image by i-Images / Piscine

While a number of examples relate specifically to the British monarchy, most of these reasons are applicable to other monarchies around the world, and we have tried to include broader examples and statistics.

1) Having a monarch unites the people

A figurehead represents the people: politicians only represent their party, not the entire nation. As such, a monarch can guide them through the most difficult times – take George VI and Queen Elizabeth during WWII. Their presence allowed Londoners to face the Blitz, and with Buckingham Palace taking hits, they understood how the locals were feeling.

library and archives canada https://www.flickr.com/photos/lac-bac/6348497014

George VI and Queen Elizabeth ruled Great Britain during World War II (Library and Archives Canada)

Events like jubilees and coronations not only give us days off (yay!)

It’s not very often that crowds gather when a politician is in town – but when a royal visit is announced, Union flags go out and flowers are bought to be handed out as a token of respect.

2) Constitutional monarchy means stability

Governments come and go – they can even be overthrown – but the monarchy endures. The continuity that a ruler brings to his country ensures stability through a single personage, who often has the power to intervene if a situation demands it, helping to run the state through a system of checks and balances and counterweight.

Political scientist Victor Menaldo notes that from 1950 to 2006, monarchies in the Middle East offered much more stability than other forms of government; they are more likely to survive in power and help control extreme factions and groups, such as Morocco, Jordan and Saudi Arabia.

3) The monarchy is cheaper than a republic

We are no longer going to explain the financing of the British monarchy to you – you can read all about it here. But presidencies typically cost a LOT more – just mention President Trump’s continued visits to Mar a Lago, estimated at $ 1-3 million per go. The French president costs £ 103.5million, and this article places the presidency of the Italian nation in the region of £ 193million a year, functioning much like a sovereign, with a prime minister leading the government.

The British monarchy cost £ 40million in 2015/16 (and the Queen does not receive a salary for her work), the Dutch £ 31million, Norway £ 17.2million, 11.6million of pounds sterling for the Swedish head of state, 10.8 million pounds in Belgium, the Danish monarchy cost 9.1 million pounds and the 6.1 million Spanish pounds (from the Telegraph).

4) Countries with monarchies are less corrupt and more trusting

It is always said that politicians are untrustworthy – they make promises before an election, then come back to them after. Polls show that now, more than ever, politicians are not seen as trustworthy. Petra Schleiter and Edward Morgan-Jones suggest that governments with constitutional monarchies are more likely to consult their people in early elections, compared to appointed and directly elected presidents.

Andreas Bergh and Christian Bjørnskov find that social trust is higher in monarchies, which is associated with lower crime and corruption.

“Successful democratic political cultures” such as monarchies are characterized by “legal continuity, compromise, self-restraint, suspicion of radicalism, and regular and moderate political adjustments and corrections”.

Finally, Transparency International’s corruption perception index shows that in the top 10 countries for transparency and the absence of corruption, seven of them have a king or queen at the head of the state. These are Denmark, New Zealand, Sweden, Norway, the Netherlands, Luxembourg and Canada. See!

5) The monarchy is good for the economy

Former Bank of England rate fixer Tim Besley wrote an article suggesting that countries with “weak executive constraints” that have gone from being a non-hereditary ruler to a hereditary ruler (i.e. – say a monarchy) increase the country’s average annual economic growth by 1.03% per year – that’s a lot!

Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, is credited with injecting £ 152million into the fashion industry. (Stephen Lock / i-Images)

A phenomenon called the “valley of tears” – a period of stagnation after institutional reforms – is not only less, but does not appear in monarchies.

Nations with monarchies “are doing quite well in terms of the economic framework.” In the World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business Index, five of the top ten have monarchies: New Zealand, Denmark, Norway, United Kingdom and Australia.

The British Royal Family contributes £ 1.155bn to the economy, taking £ 535m from tourism in 2015. The fashion industry has also been affected: the ‘Kate effect’ of brands’ Reached and Approved ‘has seen £ 152million injected into the industry. £ 101million is attributed to the ‘Charlotte Effect’ and £ 76million to the ‘George Effect’.

In China, The Queen and Royal Family has an impact on brand perception, meaning consumers are more likely to buy it if seen on a Royal.

6) Monarchs have morals – their work is for life

Heirs to the throne are usually bred to know their position and learn the ropes of their future profession. This makes them more experienced than the politicians who rule the country.

The fact that the role lasts a lifetime (very few monarchs abdicate except the Dutch, for whom it is a tradition) means that they cannot be bought: they cannot gain more power without many changes. of rules in parliament and they don’t need the money.

With the exception of a few rogue leaders in the past, they also want to do their best for their people – no one wants a bad day to be remembered: Japanese Emperor Hirohito pleaded for surrender after the Second World War, despite the army’s desire to fight, and it saved thousands of lives. And do you remember the coronation oath taken by British monarchs? They “solemnly promise” to rule “according to their respective laws and customs”, as well as to use “law and justice, in mercy. […] in all judgments ”, as well as to protect the Church of England.

7) The constitutional monarchy makes sense

Governing a country is hard work – just watch the new rulers start to show their gray! Separating the positions of Head of State and Head of Government means that the workload is distributed: ceremonial work at home and abroad (such as the presentation of honors, hospitality and state visits ) are supported by a single party, while the Prime Minister can focus more on running the country.

Soft diplomacy is also a great weapon and is currently being deployed in the UK as Brexit negotiations begin, with the Cambridges having visited Paris and Prince Charles and Camilla having completed a tour of central Europe.

This sentiment is perceived by the British people: 76% support the constitutional monarchy in the country, according to a 2016 poll, and 75% also believe that the monarchy has an important role to play in the future of the UK.

8) Important causes and problems are highlighted

Royals can emphasize the need to debate certain topics through their charities, while staying above politics. Prince Charles, for example, has campaigned on environmental issues for decades, and Diana, Princess of Wales, has been successful in changing opinion on AIDS, and her work has seen landmines banned internationally. Currently, the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and Prince Harry are trying to remove the stigma surrounding mental health. Would these things happen otherwise?

Garden parties recognize the work done in our communities. Image by i-Images

Garden parties and honors recognize the unsung heroes of our communities, which a prime minister or president might not have time to do. People generally prefer to be invited to a palace rather than a political building, don’t they? There is something quite special about walking the halls of a century-old palace.

Source link